Fleet Operational Patterns — Sages Ecosystem Learnings
Fleet Operational Patterns — Sages Ecosystem Learnings
Section titled “Fleet Operational Patterns — Sages Ecosystem Learnings”Source scope: All 6 sages-openclaw workspace agents (Link, Mineru, Riju, Sidon, Tulin, Yunobo) plus OpenClaw 2026.3.28 platform. Audience: gormes-agent planner, builder, and reviewer skills. Relationship to existing docs: The Cross-Project Feature Map covers 12 external open-source projects (hermes-agent, honcho, gormes, mercury-agent, space-agent, picoclaw, etc.). This document covers the operational ecosystem those projects don’t expose: how a real fleet runs, what patterns emerge, and what gormes-agent is missing from its own operational model.
Executive Summary
Section titled “Executive Summary”The Sages fleet runs 6 AI agents under OpenClaw orchestration with supervisord process management. Each agent has a standardized workspace layout (SOUL.md + IDENTITY.md + AGENTS.md + TOOLS.md + USER.md + MEMORY.md + memory/ + skills/), shared infrastructure (qmd hybrid search, agent-browser), and a formalized blocker policy. gormes-agent has none of this operational scaffolding.
Key findings:
- gormes-agent has zero fleet-level awareness — no session health monitoring, no cross-agent drift detection, no blocker policy
- The fleet’s standardized workspace model is a template gormes-agent should adopt for its own multi-agent story
- OpenClaw’s ACP bridge, sandboxing, backup, and device management represent capabilities gormes-agent’s Phase 5/6 roadmap doesn’t yet address
- The fleet’s Git delivery contract and session reliability rules are proven operational patterns gormes-agent lacks
1. Fleet Infrastructure — What gormes-agent Is Missing
Section titled “1. Fleet Infrastructure — What gormes-agent Is Missing”1.1 Standardized Agent Workspace Layout (ALL 6 agents)
Section titled “1.1 Standardized Agent Workspace Layout (ALL 6 agents)”Every Sages agent uses the same directory structure. gormes-agent has a rich internal architecture but no formalized multi-agent workspace model:
workspace-<agent>/├── SOUL.md # Identity, mission, non-negotiable behavior├── IDENTITY.md # Full credential: role, domain, personality├── AGENTS.md # Operational workflow: startup, maintenance, delivery├── TOOLS.md # Dev environment, commands, dependencies├── USER.md # Durable facts about Juan (the operator)├── MEMORY.md # Curated long-term decisions and context├── memory/ # Daily notes and project objectives│ ├── YYYY-MM-DD.md│ └── PROJECT-OBJECTIVES.md├── sessions/ # Conversation transcripts└── skills/ # Agent-specific capabilities ├── qmd/SKILL.md # Hybrid search (ALL agents share this) ├── agent-browser/SKILL.md # Browser automation (ALL agents share this) └── <domain-skill>/SKILL.mdWhat gormes-agent should adopt:
| Element | gormes-agent current state | Fleet standard |
|---|---|---|
| SOUL.md identity | Partial (docs reference, not runtime-enforced) | Every agent loads SOUL.md into every session |
| AGENTS.md workflow | Exists but project-focused | Clear startup checklist + delivery contract |
| MEMORY.md curation | Goncho covers this at DB level | Human-readable complement to Goncho’s structured memory |
| USER.md operator context | USER.md content injected via prompt builder | Standardized per-agent USER.md |
| memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md | Not present | Daily handoff logs, session continuity |
| Skills directory | Rich (20+ skills) but all project-specific | Standard qmd + agent-browser shared across fleet |
| PROJECT-OBJECTIVES.md | TODO.md covers blockers only | Active project goals with completion criteria |
Recommendation: gormes-agent should split its identity/runtime model into these standardized layers. Goncho already provides the structured memory backend — it needs the human-readable frontend files (USER.md, MEMORY.md, daily notes) as first-class artifacts that the prompt builder injects.
1.2 Session Health Monitoring (from Link)
Section titled “1.2 Session Health Monitoring (from Link)”Link’s session-health-monitor skill is fleet-wide agent health monitoring. gormes-agent’s doctor command checks local runtime health but has no concept of monitoring other agent instances.
What Link monitors:
- Session file sizes with thresholds: warn at 500KB, alert at 2MB
- Heartbeat freshness: warn at 45min, alert at 90min
- supervisord process status
- Cross-agent session comparisons to detect anomalies
What gormes-agent should adopt:
| Capability | Current gormes state | Fleet standard |
|---|---|---|
| Session size monitoring | Not present | 500KB/2MB size tiers |
| Heartbeat age alerting | Not present | 45min/90min freshness tiers |
| Cross-agent health | Not present (single-binary model) | Fleet-wide comparison |
| Degraded mode visibility | Partial (doctor output) | Explicit alert levels |
Recommendation: Add gormes health as a fleet-aware command. Even for single-binary deployments, operators running multiple gormes instances (one per channel, one per environment) need cross-instance visibility. Track session sizes, heartbeat age, Goncho extraction queue depth, and tool execution failures in a structured health output.
1.3 Formalized Blocker Policy (from Mineru, adopted by all)
Section titled “1.3 Formalized Blocker Policy (from Mineru, adopted by all)”Every fleet agent follows the same blocker handling protocol. gormes-agent has no formalized blocker policy — work just stalls silently.
Fleet blocker protocol:
- Classify:
access|infra|dependency|decision|bug|unknown - Dual-record:
memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md(daily log) +TODO.mdorMEMORY.md(durable) - Evidence: exact command, stderr, checked paths
- Auto-pivot: switch to highest-impact unblocked work in same domain
- Report:
Blocked WorkandPivoted Work Completedsections with exact files
Blocker record format:
[BLOCKED] <task> — <timestamp America/Monterrey> blocker: <what is blocked> evidence: <exact error output> unblocks when: <condition> owner: <who can resolve> workaround/pivot: <new task in progress> next check: <date/time>What gormes-agent should adopt:
gormes statusshould report blocked slices with evidenceprogress.jsonrows should support ablockedstate with structured blocker metadata- Degraded mode reporting should include active blockers alongside subsystem health
- The builder skill should auto-pivot when hitting a blocker rather than stalling
1.4 Git Delivery Contract (Mandatory fleet-wide)
Section titled “1.4 Git Delivery Contract (Mandatory fleet-wide)”Every fleet agent follows the same Git workflow. gormes-agent’s AGENTS.md mentions branch rules but not the full delivery contract:
1. git status --short + git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD (preflight)2. Split commits by concern (one fix, one refactor, one docs = separate commits)3. Commit immediately after each validated slice4. Push each validated commit to origin5. If not pushed, report why and exact blocker6. End report: repo path, branch, commit hashes, push confirmationWhat gormes-agent should adopt:
- The split-commit discipline is stricter than gormes-agent’s current “don’t commit to main” rule
- Every builder pass should end with a push-or-report cycle
- The builder skill should include post-commit validation before declaring a row complete
2. Shared Fleet Infrastructure — Leverage Points for gormes-agent
Section titled “2. Shared Fleet Infrastructure — Leverage Points for gormes-agent”2.1 QMD Hybrid Search (All 6 agents)
Section titled “2.1 QMD Hybrid Search (All 6 agents)”QMD is the fleet’s shared local search infrastructure. Every agent has an identical skills/qmd/SKILL.md providing BM25 + vector hybrid search across all markdown docs in the workspace.
What it does:
- Searches memory/, sessions/, TOOLS.md, USER.md, AGENTS.md, MEMORY.md
- BM25 keyword + vector similarity hybrid ranking
- Works offline, no external service
gormes-agent gap:
- Goncho provides semantic recall for conversation context
- No equivalent for searching across documentation, runbooks, or agent instructions
session_searchtool is session-bound, not workspace-wide
Recommendation: Add a gormes search command (or gormes qmd subcommand) that indexes and searches all markdown docs in the workspace. This fills the gap between Goncho’s structured memory (session-level) and the operator’s need to search across all documentation, runbooks, and agent history.
2.2 Agent-Browser / Browser Automation (All 6 agents)
Section titled “2.2 Agent-Browser / Browser Automation (All 6 agents)”Every fleet agent has an identical Playwright-based browser automation skill. gormes-agent has its own browser tools (Chromedp-based) but the fleet standard provides useful patterns:
Fleet browser patterns:
take_screenshot— evidence-first verificationextract_data— structured extraction with CSS selectorsnavigate_and_wait— explicit wait conditions, not blind delaysfill_form— form interaction with validation
Recommendation: Compare gormes-agent’s browser tool schemas against the fleet standard. The fleet’s extract_data with CSS selector patterns and explicit wait conditions are more operator-friendly than the current CDP-level interface.
2.3 Fleet Process Management (from Mineru)
Section titled “2.3 Fleet Process Management (from Mineru)”Mineru’s fleet-admin skill manages 7 supervisord processes with explicit port mappings:
| Agent | Port |
|---|---|
| Mineru | 18790 |
| Link | 18791 |
| Yunobo | 18792 |
| Riju | 18793 |
| Tulin | 18794 |
| Sidon | 18795 |
| task-manager | 18800 |
gormes-agent gap: gormes-agent manages gateway channels (Telegram, Discord, Slack) but has no concept of multiple gormes instances or port management for fleet deployments. An operator running gormes-agent for multiple channels simultaneously (e.g., one per Telegram bot, one per Discord server) has no tooling for this.
Recommendation: Add gormes fleet or gormes instances command that:
- Lists running gormes instances with PID, port, channels, session count
- Supports instance-level start/stop/restart
- Detects port conflicts
- This is Phase 5.E (final purge) material
3. OpenClaw Platform Capabilities — gormes-agent Parity Targets
Section titled “3. OpenClaw Platform Capabilities — gormes-agent Parity Targets”OpenClaw 2026.3.28 provides a rich operational surface that gormes-agent should match or exceed. Below is the full capability inventory with gormes-agent parity assessment.
3.0 Platform Capability Matrix
Section titled “3.0 Platform Capability Matrix”| OpenClaw Command | What It Does | gormes-agent Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
openclaw agent | Run one agent turn via Gateway | gormes chat -q | Shipped |
openclaw agents * | Manage isolated agents (workspaces, auth, routing) | Not present (single-binary model) | P2 |
openclaw approvals * | Manage exec approvals (allowlist, get, set) | gormes approvals partial | P1 |
openclaw backup * | Create and verify local backup archives | Gap (must-have listed) | P1 |
openclaw channels * | Manage chat channels (add, list, login, logout, logs, remove) | gormes gateway partial | P2 |
openclaw config * | Config helpers (get/set/unset/file/schema/validate) | gormes config partial | P2 |
openclaw configure | Interactive configuration wizard | gormes setup; readiness via gormes doctor --offline --target terminal --json | P2 |
openclaw cron * | Cron job management (add, edit, enable, disable, list, rm, run, runs) | gormes cron partial (missing: edit, runs history) | P2 |
openclaw dashboard | Open Control UI with token | gormes dashboard shipped | Shipped |
openclaw devices * | Device pairing + token management | Gap | P3 |
openclaw directory * | Contact/group ID lookup for channels | Gap | P3 |
openclaw dns * | DNS helpers (Tailscale + CoreDNS) | Out of scope (platform concern) | — |
openclaw docs | Search live docs | gormes search (planned via QMD) | P2 |
openclaw doctor | Health checks + quick fixes | gormes doctor --offline | Shipped |
openclaw gateway * | Gateway management (run, inspect, query) | gormes gateway shipped | Shipped |
openclaw health | Fetch health from running gateway | gormes gateway status | Shipped |
openclaw hooks * | Agent hook management (check, enable, disable, info, list) | Not present | P2 |
openclaw logs | Tail gateway file logs via RPC | Gap (must-have listed) | P1 |
openclaw message * | Send, read, manage messages | Implicit via gateway channels | P3 |
openclaw models * | Model discovery (aliases, auth, fallbacks, status) | gormes model + provider registry | Partial |
openclaw node * / nodes * | Headless node service management | Out of scope (single-binary model) | — |
openclaw onboard | Interactive onboarding (gateway, workspace, skills) | gormes setup alias partial | P1 |
openclaw pairing * | Secure DM pairing (approve inbound) | Gap | P3 |
openclaw plugins * | Plugin management (install, list, enable, disable, update, uninstall, marketplace, inspect) | gormes plugins partial (missing: marketplace, inspect) | P2 |
openclaw qr | iOS pairing QR generation | Out of scope | — |
openclaw reset | Reset local config/state | Gap | P2 |
openclaw sandbox * | Container sandbox management | In-flight (Docker backend) | P1 |
3.1 ACP Bridge (Agent Control Protocol)
Section titled “3.1 ACP Bridge (Agent Control Protocol)”OpenClaw provides an ACP bridge backed by the Gateway. This enables:
- Session key/label routing
- Reset-session capability
- Require-existing guard
- Password/token authentication
- Provenance modes (off, meta, meta+receipt)
gormes-agent gap: gormes-agent has an API server with OpenAI-compatible endpoints but no ACP bridge. ACP is the standard protocol for agent-to-agent and tool-to-agent communication.
Recommendation: Add ACP bridge capability in Phase 5.N. This would let gormes-agent interoperate with other ACP-compatible agents and tools, bridging the gap between the OpenClaw fleet ecosystem and the Go-native runtime.
3.2 Sandbox / Container Management
Section titled “3.2 Sandbox / Container Management”OpenClaw provides Docker-based sandbox containers for agent isolation:
openclaw sandbox list— list all containersopenclaw sandbox explain— explain effective sandbox/tool policyopenclaw sandbox recreate— remove and recreate with updated config- Browser-specific container support
gormes-agent gap: gormes-agent has a Docker sandbox backend (in-flight, Phase 5). OpenClaw’s explain functionality (showing what policy applies to a given session/agent) is a UX pattern gormes-agent should match.
Recommendation: Add gormes sandbox explain that shows the effective trust class, tool allowlist, filesystem scope, and network policy for any agent context. This makes sandbox policy operator-visible (reinforcing the “visible degraded mode” contract).
3.3 Backup / Restore
Section titled “3.3 Backup / Restore”OpenClaw provides openclaw backup with local archive creation and verification. gormes-agent’s must-have list marks backup/restore as a gap.
Recommendation: Implement gormes backup and gormes restore (Phase 5). The fleet’s approach of verifying archives after creation is a quality pattern to adopt.
3.4 Device Pairing & Token Management
Section titled “3.4 Device Pairing & Token Management”OpenClaw provides openclaw devices for device pairing and token management. gormes-agent has provider-level auth (OAuth, API keys) but no device-level authorization model.
gormes-agent gap: When gormes-agent is deployed across multiple machines or accessed by multiple operators, there’s no device-level access control. The current model assumes single-operator, single-machine.
Recommendation: Add device pairing as a Phase 5.N commodity feature. Simple implementation: TOTP or pairing codes for new device authorization, with device revocation from the operator console.
3.5 Agent Hooks System
Section titled “3.5 Agent Hooks System”OpenClaw provides a hook registry for internal agent behavior modification:
openclaw hooks list— list all hooksopenclaw hooks check— check eligibility statusopenclaw hooks enable/disable— toggle hooksopenclaw hooks info— detailed hook information
gormes-agent gap: gormes-agent has HOOK.yaml support (gateway boot hooks) but no generalized hook registry. OpenClaw’s hook system lets operators inspect and control which agent behaviors are active without editing config files.
Recommendation: Add gormes hooks command with list/enable/disable/check operations. Hooks should be inspectable at runtime, not just compile-time configured. This is Phase 5.N material.
3.6 Plugin Ecosystem
Section titled “3.6 Plugin Ecosystem”OpenClaw provides a full plugin management surface:
openclaw plugins install— install from path, archive, npm spec, ClawHub, or marketplaceopenclaw plugins list— list discovered pluginsopenclaw plugins enable/disable— toggle in configopenclaw plugins inspect— detailed inspectionopenclaw plugins doctor— report load issuesopenclaw plugins marketplace— inspect compatible marketplacesopenclaw plugins update/uninstall— lifecycle management
gormes-agent gap: gormes-agent has a plugin inventory system (internal/plugins/) and first-party plugins (Spotify, Google Meet) but lacks:
- Plugin marketplace support (ClawHub-compatible or independent)
- Plugin doctor/health reporting
- Plugin inspect with manifest details
- Third-party plugin sandboxing (WASM/subprocess isolation)
Recommendation: Phase 5 plugin parity should target marketplace compatibility, plugin doctor, and third-party sandboxing. The market enables community plugins; the sandbox protects operators from untrusted code.
3.7 Interactive Onboarding
Section titled “3.7 Interactive Onboarding”OpenClaw provides openclaw onboard — an interactive workflow covering gateway setup, workspace configuration, and skill installation.
gormes-agent gap: gormes-agent has gormes setup (a lightweight wizard alias) but lacks the depth of OpenClaw’s onboarding: model/provider selection, auth setup, gateway channel configuration, browser/CDP checks, skill discovery, and dashboard launch in one flow.
Recommendation: Keep public first-run work on gormes setup and machine-readable readiness on gormes doctor --offline --target terminal --json. Match OpenClaw’s depth through those surfaces: model/provider → auth → gateway → browser → skills → dashboard.
3.8 Memory Plugin Architecture
Section titled “3.8 Memory Plugin Architecture”OpenClaw’s memory system is plugin-based (plugin memory-core) with:
openclaw memory status— show index and provider statusopenclaw memory search— search memory filesopenclaw memory index— reindex memory files
gormes-agent gap: gormes-agent’s Goncho is monolithic (SQLite + FTS5 + Ollama embeddings). No plugin architecture for alternative backends (Turbopuffer, LanceDB, Redis).
Recommendation: The existing multi-memory backend plan (from cross-project feature map) aligns with OpenClaw’s plugin architecture. gormes-agent should expose a MemoryBackend interface so operators can swap between SQLite, PostgreSQL+pgvector, or LanceDB without changing the Goncho API surface.
4. Cross-Fleet Architectural Patterns Worth Absorbing
Section titled “4. Cross-Fleet Architectural Patterns Worth Absorbing”4.1 Session Rollover at 1500KB (All 6 agents)
Section titled “4.1 Session Rollover at 1500KB (All 6 agents)”Every fleet agent has a session reliability rule: if the session file grows above 1500KB, write a 5-line handoff summary in memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md and continue in a fresh session.
What gormes-agent should adopt:
- Goncho already tracks session size via SQLite
- Add a
gormes session rollovercommand that exports the current session, writes a handoff summary, and starts a fresh session - Make this automatic at a configurable size threshold
4.2 Evidence-Before-Claims Quality Gate (from Link, adopted fleet-wide)
Section titled “4.2 Evidence-Before-Claims Quality Gate (from Link, adopted fleet-wide)”Link’s research skill enforces: every claim must have source URL provenance. No assertion without evidence. This pattern appears across the fleet:
- Riju:
[UNVERIFIED]marking, DOI-backed validation, exact error thresholds - Yunobo: “Accessibility as product” — every screen TalkBack-validated
- Mineru: Evidence-first status reports, exact pass/fail counts
What gormes-agent should adopt:
gormes doctoroutput should include exact evidence, not summary claims- Build/test results should include exact pass/fail/skip counts
- The TDD slice skill should assert evidence before declaring a row complete
4.3 Stale-While-Revalidate Caching (from Yunobo)
Section titled “4.3 Stale-While-Revalidate Caching (from Yunobo)”Yunobo’s Flutter app uses a 30-second cache with background refresh on tab switch. This is a general pattern for any system where freshness matters but responsiveness matters more.
What gormes-agent should adopt:
- Provider status checks: cache for 30s, background refresh
- Memory extraction status: cache Goncho queue depth, background refresh
- Gateway channel status: cache channel state, background refresh
4.4 Dual-Lane Workflow (from Riju, Sidon)
Section titled “4.4 Dual-Lane Workflow (from Riju, Sidon)”Riju operates in two lanes: Lane A (physics falsification) and Lane B (research dataset ingestion). Sidon operates in GPU and CPU rendering lanes with explicit switching thresholds.
What gormes-agent should adopt:
- Build vs. plan lanes (already exists via gormes-planner vs gormes-builder)
- Provider lanes: prime provider vs fallback provider with explicit degradation reporting
- Memory lanes: structured Goncho vs ephemeral session memory with explicit boundary
5. Concrete Features gormes-agent Should Steal
Section titled “5. Concrete Features gormes-agent Should Steal”5.1 From the Fleet (Priority-Ordered)
Section titled “5.1 From the Fleet (Priority-Ordered)”| Priority | Feature | Source Agent | Target gormes Phase | Effort |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P0 | Formalized blocker policy with auto-pivot | Mineru (all agents) | Phase 5 — Final Purge | 1 week |
| P0 | Session health monitoring (size + heartbeat tiers) | Link | Phase 5 — Final Purge | 1 week |
| P0 | Evidence-before-claims quality gate in doctor/build output | Link (adopted fleet-wide) | Phase 5 — Final Purge | 1 week |
| P1 | QMD hybrid search for docs/runbooks/memory | All 6 agents | Phase 5.N — Operator surface | 2 weeks |
| P1 | Git delivery contract enforcement in builder skill | All agents | Existing builder skill | 1 week |
| P1 | Session rollover automation | All agents | Phase 5 — Final Purge | 1 week |
| P2 | Multi-instance fleet management (gormes instances) | Mineru fleet-admin | Phase 5.E — Commodity | 3 weeks |
| P2 | Standardized workspace layout for multi-agent deployments | All agents | Phase 6 — Learning Loop | 2 weeks |
| P2 | ACP bridge for agent interoperability | OpenClaw platform | Phase 5.N | 3 weeks |
| P3 | Stale-while-revalidate caching for status checks | Yunobo | Phase 5 — Observability | 1 week |
| P3 | Device pairing + token management | OpenClaw platform | Phase 5.N | 2 weeks |
5.2 From OpenClaw Platform (New Capabilities)
Section titled “5.2 From OpenClaw Platform (New Capabilities)”| Priority | Feature | Description | Target Phase |
|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | Sandbox policy explain | gormes sandbox explain — visible effective trust class, allowlist, scope | Phase 5 — Final Purge |
| P1 | ACP bridge | Session-based agent communication protocol | Phase 5.N |
| P1 | First-run setup/readiness | gormes setup plus gormes doctor --offline --target terminal --json — full model/provider/auth/gateway/browser/skills/dashboard flow | Phase 5 — Final Purge |
| P2 | Memory backend plugin architecture | Swap SQLite/Postgres/LanceDB behind Goncho interface | Phase 5 — Black Box enhancements |
| P2 | Integrated backup with archive verification | gormes backup and gormes restore | Phase 5 — Final Purge |
| P2 | Agent hooks registry | gormes hooks — list/enable/disable/check/inspect at runtime | Phase 5.N |
| P2 | Plugin marketplace + doctor | Marketplace compatibility, plugin health reporting, third-party sandboxing | Phase 5 — Final Purge |
| P2 | Logs command | gormes logs — tail gateway file logs (counterpart to openclaw logs) | Phase 5 — Final Purge |
| P3 | Container-aware runtime | Track running in Docker/Podman, adapt ports/paths | Phase 5.E |
| P3 | Device pairing + token management | Device authorization for multi-machine deployments | Phase 5.N |
6. What NOT to Adopt
Section titled “6. What NOT to Adopt”Features explicitly excluded from gormes-agent scope after fleet analysis:
| Feature | Source | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| supervisord process management | Mineru fleet-admin | gormes-agent is a single binary; process management belongs to the host |
| Trading bot ML pipeline | Mineru (reference for Yunobo) | Domain-specific; not an agent runtime concern |
| Flutter/React Native app dev workflows | Yunobo, Tulin, Sidon | gormes-agent is a Go agent runtime, not a mobile app builder |
| Physics validation golden files | Riju | Domain-specific |
| Fractal rendering GPU shaders | Sidon | Domain-specific |
| Ticket reconciliation | Tulin | Domain-specific |
| nanobot CLI dependency | Fleet infrastructure | gormes-agent must remain dependency-free (single binary) |
7. Implementation Sequence (Recommended)
Section titled “7. Implementation Sequence (Recommended)”Immediate (Next 30 Days) — Operational Foundation
Section titled “Immediate (Next 30 Days) — Operational Foundation”Week 1: Formalized blocker policy in gormes-planner + gormes-builder skillsWeek 1: Evidence-before-claims in doctor output (exact counts, not summaries)Week 2: Session health monitoring (gormes health command with size/heartbeat tiers)Week 2: Git delivery contract enforcement in builder skillWeek 3-4: QMD hybrid search (gormes search command for doc/runbook/memory)Short-Term (Next 90 Days) — Fleet Readiness
Section titled “Short-Term (Next 90 Days) — Fleet Readiness”Week 5-6: Session rollover automationWeek 7-8: Sandbox policy explain (visible effective policy)Week 9-10: Multi-instance fleet management previewWeek 9-10: Interactive onboarding (model/provider/auth/gateway/browser/skills)Week 11-12: Memory backend plugin architectureWeek 11-12: Agent hooks registry + plugin marketplace/doctorMedium-Term (Next 6 Months) — Platform Parity
Section titled “Medium-Term (Next 6 Months) — Platform Parity”Month 3-4: ACP bridge implementationMonth 4: Integrated backup/restore + logs commandMonth 5: Device pairing + standardized multi-agent workspace layoutMonth 6: Full plugin marketplace compatibility + third-party sandboxing8. Success Metrics
Section titled “8. Success Metrics”- 30 days: Blocker policy shipped, health monitoring active, evidence-before-claims in all status output
- 90 days: QMD search operational, sandbox policy visible, git delivery contract enforced
- 6 months: ACP bridge, backup/restore, multi-instance management
References
Section titled “References”- Cross-Project Feature Map — External open-source project analysis (12 projects)
- Must-Have Features — Comprehensive feature catalogue
- Upstream Lessons — Durable contracts from Hermes
- Implementation Roadmap — Current state and execution horizons
- Architecture Plan — Phase-by-phase delivery plan
- Contract Readiness — Row-level handoff contract specifications
Generated: May 1, 2026 Source: 6-agent sages-openclaw fleet ecosystem + OpenClaw 2026.3.28 platform analysis Cross-referenced against: cross-project-feature-map.md, must-have-features.md, upstream-lessons.md, architecture_plan/progress.json